Abstract
Liveable spaces and green spaces are often considered parts of the same coin. As urban development and densification increases in the contemporary city, we see green spaces disappearing from our living spaces, people being disconnected from nature, and as a result, decreasing liveability (Cilliers, 2012; Cilliers, 2013; Cilliers et al., 2010; Cilliers & Timmermans, 2013). The loss of qualitative green spaces entails missed opportunities and benefits (O’Brien, 2006) for both cities and their host communities. Although ecosystem services provided by such green spaces have a significant impact on quality of life, as well as contribute to broader economic, social and environmental benefits, these services and benefits varies across the socio-economic gradient. An investigation into the case study of Potchefstroom in South Africa, considering 12 neighbourhood parks, shed light on the perceptions of community members of different social classes in terms of the value of green spaces. An explanatory mixed-method research approach reflected on the challenges and opportunities of designing green spaces across such socio-economic gradient, within the broader umbrella of shaping liveable places for all classes, cultures and diverse economic backgrounds of the community.
