Home
Introduction
Words of Welcome
ISOCARP President
ISOCARP Secretary General
General Rapporteur
UEF Chair
Congress Team
COVID-19
Sponsorship
Sponsors
Programme
Tracks
Track 1
Track 2
Track 3
Track 4
Track 5
Track 6
Track 7
Special Track
Detailed programme
Virtual Events
Speakers
Brochure
Proceedings
Congress Recap
Virtual Presentation
Presentation Guidelines
Submit your Pre-recorded Video
Prerecorded Presentations
Prerecordings - track 1
Prerecordings - track 2
Prerecordings - track 3
Prerecordings - Special Track
Event recordings
Jan DAY 1
Jan DAY 2
Feb DAY 1
Feb DAY 2
Feb DAY 3
Submission
Submit your paper
Submit an Abstract
Guidelines
More
Papers
Registration
Fees
Tickets
About ISOCARP
ISOCARP Website
Join ISOCARP
ISOCARP Review - Volume 16
How to navigate
Zoom-presenters
Zoom-Attendees
Zoom-Moderators
Gather.Town
Congress website
Virtual Meeting Place
Schedule
Virtual Exhibition
Mentoring
Register as a Mentor
Congress Declaration
FAQs
Login
56th ISOCARP World Planning Congress, Virtual Congress
56th ISOCARP World Planning Congress, Virtual Congress
Login
Toggle navigation
Home
Introduction
Words of Welcome
ISOCARP President
ISOCARP Secretary General
General Rapporteur
UEF Chair
Congress Team
COVID-19
Sponsorship
Sponsors
Programme
Tracks
Track 1
Track 2
Track 3
Track 4
Track 5
Track 6
Track 7
Special Track
Detailed programme
Virtual Events
Speakers
Brochure
Proceedings
Congress Recap
Virtual Presentation
Presentation Guidelines
Submit your Pre-recorded Video
Prerecorded Presentations
Prerecordings - track 1
Prerecordings - track 2
Prerecordings - track 3
Prerecordings - Special Track
Event recordings
Jan DAY 1
Jan DAY 2
Feb DAY 1
Feb DAY 2
Feb DAY 3
Submission
Submit your paper
Submit an Abstract
Guidelines
More
Papers
Registration
Fees
Tickets
About ISOCARP
ISOCARP Website
Join ISOCARP
ISOCARP Review - Volume 16
How to navigate
Zoom-presenters
Zoom-Attendees
Zoom-Moderators
Gather.Town
Congress website
Virtual Meeting Place
Schedule
Virtual Exhibition
Mentoring
Register as a Mentor
Congress Declaration
FAQs
56th ISOCARP World Planning Congress, Virtual Congress
Login
Post-Soviet Street Patterns: Measuring Network Connectivity in the Largest Russian Cities
This abstract has open access
Abstract
The share of street network in the urban fabric and its connectivity are crucial characteristics of the cities’ spatial structure. Cities with properly developed and well-connected street network tend to be livable and productive. A growing body of research suggests that street network connectivity has the largest effect on walking of all the built environment features and significant effects on transit use and the amount of driving (Ewing and Cervero, 2010). The connectivity concept is widely researched and frequently applied in built-environment studies coming from the developed countries. Therewith, in Russia and other post-Soviet states it is not explored yet. There is no known attempt to examine the street connectivity in the context of post-Soviet spatial structure and to assess this quantitatively. The present study seeks to address the knowledge gap of the street network measures in Russian cities in order to draw attention to the concept of street connectivity and its potential in promoting healthy lifestyles and supporting vibrant environment. Many studies of the post-Soviet (or more broadly, post-socialist) urban structure highlight its peculiarities stemming from specific political and economic conditions under which it formed (Tosics, 2005). In Russian cities the Soviet period of urbanisation became the defining one and in many ways paving the way for future development, since it is during this period that the main city growth took place, both population and territory-wise. As an essential element of urban structure, the street network of the post-Soviet city also has characteristic features that do not correspond to other found in the world. The study includes analysis of such components of street network connectivity as street density, LAS (land allocated to streets), intersection density and the link/node ratio. The three main objectives envisaged by this research - examining the configuration of street network, measuring its specific features and exploring their interrelation - are accomplished by using the GIS tools and statistical methods. The empirical analysis of the street patterns is performed on a sample of the 13 largest Russian cities. The results reveal major dysfunctionalities in the post-Soviet street patterns: all the Russian cities covered in the present study have comparatively low values of all four calculated connectivity components that are crucially important for creating an efficiently laid out street network. The Russian cities have inherited the post-Soviet urban structure with underdeveloped street network. The low motorisation rate typical of the Soviet cities resulted in the extremely low share of street network in the urban fabric: the indicator LAS in the largest Russian cities is characteristic of the cities in the pre-automobile era and 2-3 times lower than in the European and North American cities. The values of other indicators calculated for the Russian cities are also significantly lower in comparison with their 'western' counterparts. This is partially explained by the fact that evaluating transport demand or perspectives of the motorization rate growth during the Soviet period were often substituted by the purely architectural and aesthetic considerations. While the estimations of the road density and connectivity show significant lag of the Russian cities in this area and confirm the necessity of the construction and transformation of the current street networks, city authorities should ensure that the investment in urban transportation infrastructure are made where they are most needed. The cities with post-Soviet street patterns need to invest in adequate and well-laid out street networks, paying special attention to the improvement of the network quality characteristics such as permeability and uniformity and increasing the density and connectivity of the network, especially on the periphery.
Abstract ID :
ISO433
Submission Type
Research Paper
Submission Track
3: Planning for Urban Connectivity
Full paper :
View Attachment
If the file does not load,
click here
to open/download the file.
Close
Associated Sessions
Track 3 | Session 1. Redefining Urban Connectivity From Network Planning To Local Design
Author
ES
Ekaterina Saveleva
Senior lecturer
,
Perm National Research Polytechnic University
Abstracts With Same Type
Abstract ID
Abstract Title
Abstract Topic
Submission Type
Primary Author
ISO421
'Place making as a multi –faceted tool in urban design’ – a strategic planning approach in case of Hubballi City, Karnataka, India
Research Paper
Ms Anita C. Jakkappanavar
ISO470
Lessons from Radical Environmentalism, Describing Possible Alternatives for the Resilient Planning in the Peripheral Regions
Research Paper
Anna Klimczak
ISO39
"Bamboo as alternate building material"
Research Paper
Hiral Joshi
ISO182
+CityxChange Citizen Participation Playbook. A roadmap for inclusive citizen engagement in the energy transition challenge
Research Paper
Javier Buron
ISO401
15-minute community life circle---planning on aging-friendly public open space
Research Paper
le Dong
ISO355
A collaborative design studio approach to safeguard waterfront resilience in Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
Research Paper
Lucia Melchiors
ISO35
A multi-factor coordinated identification method of ecological pattern and optimization suggestions
Research Paper
Mr Junyu Han
ISO389
A review of human bio meteorology research to propose a policy framework for improving outdoor thermal comfort in hot-arid Indian cities
Research Paper
Shreya Banerjee
ISO258
A study on the mode of public participation in Chinese urban design under the concept of multi-body participation:community-building oriented with multi-age participation
Research Paper
Miss Xiaoying Luan
View All Abstracts
297
visits
Forgot your Password?