Home
Introduction
Words of Welcome
ISOCARP President
ISOCARP Secretary General
General Rapporteur
UEF Chair
Congress Team
COVID-19
Sponsorship
Sponsors
Programme
Tracks
Track 1
Track 2
Track 3
Track 4
Track 5
Track 6
Track 7
Special Track
Detailed programme
Virtual Events
Speakers
Brochure
Proceedings
Congress Recap
Virtual Presentation
Presentation Guidelines
Submit your Pre-recorded Video
Prerecorded Presentations
Prerecordings - track 1
Prerecordings - track 2
Prerecordings - track 3
Prerecordings - Special Track
Event recordings
Jan DAY 1
Jan DAY 2
Feb DAY 1
Feb DAY 2
Feb DAY 3
Submission
Submit your paper
Submit an Abstract
Guidelines
More
Papers
Registration
Fees
Tickets
About ISOCARP
ISOCARP Website
Join ISOCARP
ISOCARP Review - Volume 16
How to navigate
Zoom-presenters
Zoom-Attendees
Zoom-Moderators
Gather.Town
Congress website
Virtual Meeting Place
Schedule
Virtual Exhibition
Mentoring
Register as a Mentor
Congress Declaration
FAQs
Login
56th ISOCARP World Planning Congress, Virtual Congress
56th ISOCARP World Planning Congress, Virtual Congress
Login
Toggle navigation
Home
Introduction
Words of Welcome
ISOCARP President
ISOCARP Secretary General
General Rapporteur
UEF Chair
Congress Team
COVID-19
Sponsorship
Sponsors
Programme
Tracks
Track 1
Track 2
Track 3
Track 4
Track 5
Track 6
Track 7
Special Track
Detailed programme
Virtual Events
Speakers
Brochure
Proceedings
Congress Recap
Virtual Presentation
Presentation Guidelines
Submit your Pre-recorded Video
Prerecorded Presentations
Prerecordings - track 1
Prerecordings - track 2
Prerecordings - track 3
Prerecordings - Special Track
Event recordings
Jan DAY 1
Jan DAY 2
Feb DAY 1
Feb DAY 2
Feb DAY 3
Submission
Submit your paper
Submit an Abstract
Guidelines
More
Papers
Registration
Fees
Tickets
About ISOCARP
ISOCARP Website
Join ISOCARP
ISOCARP Review - Volume 16
How to navigate
Zoom-presenters
Zoom-Attendees
Zoom-Moderators
Gather.Town
Congress website
Virtual Meeting Place
Schedule
Virtual Exhibition
Mentoring
Register as a Mentor
Congress Declaration
FAQs
56th ISOCARP World Planning Congress, Virtual Congress
Login
Climate Crisis Adaptation – Strategies Towards Resilience – from Different Perspectives and in Comparable Conditions as Starting Points for Urban and Architectural Interventions in Milan and Vienna
This abstract has open access
Abstract
Background and Status Quo – the “Problem” Over the course of the last five years, most large cities have been experiencing dramatic effects of the climate crisis. In August 2018, the New York Times published “Losing Earth: The Decade We Almost Stopped Climate Change,” an explicit chronicle of all the ignored warnings based on scientific evidence and the missed opportunities to counteract global heating when it was still comparably easy to do so. Research and Action Plan This paper focuses on illustrating different scenarios for cities on a 1.5-degree pathway, meaning a 50-55% net emissions reduction by 2030 versus 2010 levels. Five major shifts would underlie a transition to this pathway: 1. Industry 2. Transport 3. Power 4. Buildings 5. Avoided Deforestation & Agriculture Depending on the different functions of the global cities, various conditions arise as starting points for potential interventions. The two selected cities, Milan and Vienna have a lot in common, as they are comparable in size, population, social set-up and geographic position, and experience e.g. the increase of heat in the city. Both cities have already invested to become carbon neutral. Current strategies in both cities will serve as groundwork regarding their applicability elsewhere. Urban and architectural interventions will be evaluated and exchanged to share knowledge. The goal is a flexibly applicable and further developable parts kit. Vienna suffers from a lack of green spaces in the inner districts. High pollution levels in Milan negatively affect the population but politicians rated businesses interests higher. The COVID-19 outbreak in Vienna and Milan acted as a game-changer. Streets were closed and driving lanes reduced to facilitate pedestrian and cycle movement at safe distances. Will any of these interventions remain? There are good reasons for hope. Environmental agendas have gained significant support. The public had to quickly understand complicated math curves. New behavioral patterns were adopted rapidly. Lockdowns have no immediate impact on reducing CO2 from the atmosphere. There is growing scientific evidence of a connection between environmental pollution and COVID-19-related mortality rates. Environmental factors like the pre-outbreak level of air pollution— especially nitrogen dioxide (NO2) – play a role. Geography is another factor: Teheran, Northern Italy and Madrid are surrounded by mountains that keep cold air and pollutants close to the ground. Although the negative health consequences of constant exposure to air pollution were known before, addressing them has now gained additional weight. Concluding, governments are well-advised to use the strategies developed for fighting COVID-19 to make serious efforts to fight climate change Call for Action in the Cities Cities are key contributors to climate change and at the same time their residents experience the consequences most directly through the negative impact on urban life. As a result, not only many European mayors, but also their North American and Asian counterparts have started to counteract. On one hand, the documentation of best practice examples in different cities is still valid, but cities have to simultaneously start implementing unpopular and quite radical measures if they want to achieve visible results. They have to transform the sources of energy provision, apply innovative planning solutions that avoid further sprawl leading to densification, promote a sustainable way of building and renovating the existing building stock, secure the provision of CO2-neutral public transportation and achieve the change of mobility behavioral patterns. These enormous challenges are difficult to meet alone. Act Together Cities with similar challenges and comparable resources can therefore support each other and act together. Milan and Vienna have a lot in common and experience dramatically increasing heat in the city.
Abstract ID :
ISO212
Submission Type
Research Paper
Submission Track
4: Safeguarding the Urban Resilience
Full paper :
View Attachment
If the file does not load,
click here
to open/download the file.
Close
Associated Sessions
Track 4 | Session 1. Water Resilient Cities
Author
ST
Silja Tillner
Co-Principal
,
Architects Tillner & Willinger
Abstracts With Same Type
Abstract ID
Abstract Title
Abstract Topic
Submission Type
Primary Author
ISO421
'Place making as a multi –faceted tool in urban design’ – a strategic planning approach in case of Hubballi City, Karnataka, India
Research Paper
Ms Anita C. Jakkappanavar
ISO470
Lessons from Radical Environmentalism, Describing Possible Alternatives for the Resilient Planning in the Peripheral Regions
Research Paper
Anna Klimczak
ISO39
"Bamboo as alternate building material"
Research Paper
Hiral Joshi
ISO182
+CityxChange Citizen Participation Playbook. A roadmap for inclusive citizen engagement in the energy transition challenge
Research Paper
Javier Buron
ISO401
15-minute community life circle---planning on aging-friendly public open space
Research Paper
le Dong
ISO355
A collaborative design studio approach to safeguard waterfront resilience in Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
Research Paper
Lucia Melchiors
ISO35
A multi-factor coordinated identification method of ecological pattern and optimization suggestions
Research Paper
Mr Junyu Han
ISO389
A review of human bio meteorology research to propose a policy framework for improving outdoor thermal comfort in hot-arid Indian cities
Research Paper
Shreya Banerjee
ISO258
A study on the mode of public participation in Chinese urban design under the concept of multi-body participation:community-building oriented with multi-age participation
Research Paper
Miss Xiaoying Luan
View All Abstracts
227
visits
Forgot your Password?